From Conventional to Solar Streetlighting: CAPEX/OPEX Comparison and Smart Control Strategies for Cities

Transitioning from conventional grid‑connected streetlighting to solar streetlighting is no longer just a sustainability initiative; it is an infrastructure and budget optimization decision. For cities, utilities, and EPCs, the key questions are consistent: How do CAPEX and OPEX compare over the lifecycle? What technical parameters matter most? And how can smart control strategies unlock additional savings and operational resilience?

This article provides a structured, engineering‑driven view of the move from conventional to solar streetlighting, with a focus on capital and operating costs, system sizing, and smart control architectures suitable for urban deployments.

1. Conventional vs Solar Streetlighting: System Architecture and Cost Drivers

1.1 Conventional grid‑connected streetlighting

A typical conventional streetlight installation consists of:

• Luminaires: Usually high‑pressure sodium (HPS), metal halide, or increasingly LED
• Poles and brackets
• Underground cabling and junction boxes
• Feeder pillars and distribution boards
• Utility grid connection (service lines, meters, protection)

Primary cost drivers (CAPEX):

• Trenching and reinstatement (civil works)
• Copper cabling and conduits
• Distribution boards and protection equipment
• Utility connection and associated fees
• Luminaires and poles

Primary cost drivers (OPEX):

• Electricity consumption (kWh) and demand charges
• Lamp/driver replacement and maintenance
• Cable fault location and repair
• Periodic inspections and night patrols

In dense urban corridors, underground cabling and civil works can represent 30–50% of total CAPEX. In brownfield retrofits, traffic management and reinstatement costs can push this even higher.

1.2 Solar streetlighting system architecture

A modern solar streetlighting system is typically a stand‑alone DC system comprising:

• High‑efficiency LED luminaire (e.g., 20–80 W)
• Photovoltaic (PV) module (e.g., 80–200 Wp depending on latitude and autonomy)
• Energy storage (LiFePO₄ or LFP battery, typically 12–24 V, 10–60 Ah)
• Charge controller (often integrated as a solar streetlight controller)
• Pole and mounting structures (designed for wind load and panel orientation)
• Optional communication module (LoRaWAN, NB‑IoT, LTE‑M) for smart control

Key differences versus conventional systems:

• No trenching or grid cabling between poles
• No utility connection or energy billing
• Each pole is an independent energy system, often with integrated controls and sensors

1.3 CAPEX comparison: where costs shift

At first glance, a solar streetlight has a higher unit cost than a grid‑connected LED luminaire. However, the system‑level CAPEX tells a different story, especially where civil works and grid connection are expensive or constrained.

Illustrative CAPEX comparison for 100 poles (typical arterial road project)

Assumptions (for comparison only; actual values vary by region):

• Pole spacing: 30 m, 9 m pole height
• Conventional LED: 60 W, grid‑connected
• Solar LED: 40 W with smart dimming, 150 Wp PV, 12.8 V 40 Ah LFP battery
• Underground cabling length: ~3 km

Conventional LED system (100 poles)

• Poles, brackets, foundations: $60,000
• LED luminaires (60 W): $25,000
• Underground cabling, conduits, junction boxes: $70,000
• Trenching, reinstatement, traffic management: $80,000
• Feeder pillars, protection, meters, grid connection fees: $35,000

Total CAPEX ≈ $270,000 (≈ $2,700 per pole)

Solar streetlighting system (100 poles)

• Poles, brackets, foundations (reinforced for panel): $70,000
• LED luminaires (40 W, programmable driver): $28,000
• PV modules (150 Wp avg): $35,000
• LFP batteries (12.8 V 40 Ah): $45,000
• Integrated charge controllers and wiring: $22,000
• Optional communication gateways and commissioning: $15,000

Total CAPEX ≈ $215,000 (≈ $2,150 per pole)

In this scenario, the higher component cost of solar is offset by eliminating trenching, cabling, and grid connection. In locations where civil works are cheaper and grid access is straightforward, the CAPEX gap may narrow or reverse; in constrained or greenfield corridors, solar frequently achieves 10–30% lower installed CAPEX.

1.4 OPEX comparison: energy and maintenance

Conventional LED system (per pole, annual):

• Power: 60 W, operating 12 h/night → 0.72 kWh/day → ~263 kWh/year
• Electricity tariff: $0.12/kWh → ~$31.5/year
• Maintenance (lamp/driver replacement, patrols, cable faults): $15–25/year (average)

Total OPEX ≈ $47–57 per pole per year

Solar streetlighting system (per pole, annual):

• Grid energy: 0 kWh → $0
• Preventive maintenance (panel cleaning, visual inspection): $5–10/year
• Battery replacement amortization (LFP, 10–12 year design life): $8–12/year
• Communication platform / data: $2–5/year (if using smart control platform)

Total OPEX ≈ $15–27 per pole per year

Over a 10‑year period, OPEX savings of $200–400 per pole are typical, not including potential tariff escalations or penalties for exceeding municipal energy budgets.

2. Lifecycle Costing and Payback for Municipal Decision‑Makers

2.1 10–20 year total cost of ownership (TCO)

For municipal planners, the relevant metric is not just CAPEX but lifecycle cost over the asset’s service life.

Using the earlier example (100 poles):

• Analysis period: 15 years
• Discount rate: 5%
• Electricity tariff escalation: 3%/year

Conventional LED system (100 poles)

• CAPEX: $270,000
• OPEX (energy + maintenance, NPV over 15 years): ≈ $75,000–90,000

TCO (15 years) ≈ $345,000–360,000

Solar streetlighting system (100 poles)

• CAPEX: $215,000
• OPEX (maintenance + platform, NPV over 15 years): ≈ $35,000–55,000
• Battery replacement (one full replacement at year 12, NPV): ≈ $25,000–30,000

TCO (15 years) ≈ $275,000–300,000

Even with conservative assumptions, solar streetlighting can deliver a 15–25% lower TCO over 15 years, with reduced exposure to energy price volatility.

2.2 Payback and internal rate of return (IRR)

For cities transitioning from existing HPS or early‑generation LED to solar streetlighting, the payback period depends on:

• Existing energy consumption and tariffs
• Residual life of current assets
• Availability of concessional finance or green bonds

Typical payback ranges:

• HPS → Solar streetlighting: 4–7 years
• Conventional LED → Solar streetlighting: 7–10 years

When combined with smart control strategies (adaptive dimming, remote scheduling), IRRs of 10–18% are achievable in many markets, especially where grid tariffs are high or night‑time tariffs are not discounted.

2.3 Non‑financial drivers

Beyond CAPEX/OPEX, several strategic drivers influence municipal decisions:

• Resilience: Solar streetlights remain operational during grid outages, enhancing safety and disaster response.
• Scalability: No dependency on substation capacity or cable routing; deployments can be phased rapidly.
• Regulatory compliance: Support for carbon reduction targets and green procurement policies.
• Public perception: Visible sustainability investment with measurable impact (kWh and CO₂ savings).

3. Technical Specification Considerations for Solar Streetlighting

3.1 Luminaire and optical performance

Key parameters for B2B buyers:

• LED power rating: 20–80 W typical for local roads and collectors
• Luminous efficacy: ≥ 140–160 lm/W for modern LEDs
• Color temperature (CCT): 3,000–4,000 K for urban environments (reduced glare, better color rendering)
• Ingress protection: IP65 or higher
• Impact resistance: IK08–IK10
• Lumen maintenance: L70 ≥ 50,000–100,000 hours

Well‑designed solar streetlighting uses optical lenses tailored to road geometry (Type II, III, IV distributions) to minimize power while meeting illuminance and uniformity requirements (e.g., EN 13201, IES RP‑8).

3.2 Solar module sizing and configuration

Critical parameters:

• Module power (Wp): Typically 80–200 Wp per pole
• Cell technology: Mono‑crystalline PERC or TOPCon with module efficiency ≥ 20%
• Design energy yield: Based on local solar irradiance (kWh/m²/day) and tilt angle
• System autonomy: 2–3 nights at reduced output for urban roads; 3–5 nights for critical infrastructure

Example sizing (mid‑latitude, 4.5 kWh/m²/day):

• Luminaire: 40 W nominal, dimmed profile (see section 4)
• Average nightly energy: ~180 Wh
• Required daily solar generation (including 20% losses): ~225 Wh
• PV module: 150 Wp → 150 W × 4.5 h (equivalent full sun hours) ≈ 675 Wh/day → sufficient with margin

3.3 Energy storage: battery chemistry and design life

Modern solar streetlighting increasingly uses LiFePO₄ (LFP) batteries due to:

• 2,000–4,000 cycles at 80% depth of discharge (DoD)
• Wide temperature operating range (−10 °C to +55 °C typical)
• High round‑trip efficiency (≥ 90–95%)
• Enhanced safety and lower maintenance vs. lead‑acid

Typical specifications:

• Nominal voltage: 12.8 or 25.6 V
• Capacity: 20–80 Ah depending on load and autonomy
• Design life: 10–12 years at controlled DoD and temperature

Battery enclosures should provide:

• IP65 or better protection
• Thermal management (passive ventilation or insulation)
• Over‑current, over‑voltage, and short‑circuit protection via integrated BMS

3.4 Charge controller and system protection

The solar streetlight controller is the system’s brain, managing:

• MPPT (maximum power point tracking) for efficient solar charging
• Battery charge/discharge control and SoC estimation
• Load control (on/off, dimming profiles)
• Protections: over‑charge, over‑discharge, over‑temperature, reverse polarity

Key specifications:

• MPPT efficiency: ≥ 95–98%
• Operating temperature: −20 °C to +60 °C
• Communication interfaces: RS‑485, LoRa, NB‑IoT, LTE‑M or proprietary RF

3.5 Mechanical design and wind loading

Poles and brackets must be designed for:

• Local wind speed standards (e.g., 150 km/h or region‑specific codes)
• Additional sail area and weight of PV modules
• Corrosion resistance (hot‑dip galvanized steel, powder‑coated aluminum)

Foundation design should consider soil bearing capacity and potential uplift due to wind loads on the PV panel.

4. Smart Control Strategies: From Fixed Timers to Adaptive Lighting

The real differentiator between basic solar streetlighting and a modern urban lighting network is the control strategy. Smart control reduces energy demand, extends battery life, and improves service levels.

4.1 Baseline control: dusk‑to‑dawn with fixed dimming

Most solar streetlights begin with a simple profile:

• Automatic dusk detection via PV voltage or light sensor
• Fixed output (e.g., 100%) for a set number of hours
• Reduced output (e.g., 50–70%) for late‑night hours

Example profile:

• 18:00–22:00: 100% output
• 22:00–05:00: 50% output
• 05:00–06:00: 75% output

This alone can reduce nightly energy consumption by 30–40% compared to constant full‑power operation.

4.2 Adaptive dimming based on traffic and occupancy

Adding sensors (PIR, microwave radar, or video analytics) enables adaptive lighting:

• Base level (e.g., 30–40% output) when no movement is detected
• Step‑up to 80–100% when vehicles, cyclists, or pedestrians are detected
• Configurable hold‑time and fade‑time to avoid flicker

In low‑to‑medium traffic corridors, adaptive dimming can reduce average energy consumption by 40–60%, allowing:

• Smaller PV and battery sizes (lower CAPEX)
• Higher autonomy and reliability in poor weather

4.3 Centralized management via wireless networks

For city‑scale deployments, a central management system (CMS) is recommended. Typical architecture:

• Each pole has a controller with wireless communication (LoRaWAN, NB‑IoT, LTE‑M, or mesh RF)
• Gateways aggregate data and connect to a cloud or on‑premises platform
• Operators access a web dashboard or integrate via APIs into existing SCADA/asset management systems

Core CMS functions:

• Real‑time monitoring of status, alarms, and battery SoC
• Remote configuration of dimming profiles and schedules
• Asset inventory and maintenance planning
• Energy and CO₂ savings reporting

This eliminates manual night patrols and enables condition‑based maintenance, reducing truck rolls and downtime.

4.4 Predictive control using weather and battery analytics

Advanced smart control strategies leverage data to further optimize performance:

• Weather‑aware dimming: If several cloudy days are forecast, the system proactively reduces output to preserve autonomy.
• Battery health analytics: SoH (state of health) estimation to predict end‑of‑life and schedule replacements.
• Anomaly detection: Identifying under‑performing panels, shading issues, or vandalism from deviations in expected generation.

These approaches can extend battery life by 1–3 years and improve network reliability, particularly in regions with seasonal variability in solar irradiance.

4.5 Integration with smart city platforms

Solar streetlighting can be a foundational layer for smart city infrastructure. Poles can host:

• Environmental sensors (air quality, noise)
• CCTV or ANPR cameras
• Public Wi‑Fi or small cells
• EV slow‑charging points (where energy budgets permit)

Through open APIs, lighting data and controls can be integrated into broader smart city dashboards, enabling cross‑domain analytics (e.g., correlating lighting levels with traffic patterns or crime statistics).

5. Real‑World Application Scenarios and Deployment Strategies

5.1 Greenfield peri‑urban roads

In expanding cities, new peri‑urban corridors often lack nearby grid infrastructure. Extending medium‑voltage lines and building new substations can take 18–36 months and require high upfront CAPEX.

Solar streetlighting advantage:

• Rapid deployment without waiting for grid extension
• Lower overall CAPEX by eliminating MV/LV infrastructure
• Modular scaling as traffic volumes increase

A typical deployment might use 30–50 W solar streetlights with 120–160 Wp panels and LFP batteries, configured with fixed dimming profiles and optional motion sensors at key intersections.

5.2 Retrofitting HPS networks in established districts

Many cities still operate 70–250 W HPS luminaires with high energy and maintenance costs. In some cases, underground cabling is aging or overloaded.

Hybrid strategy:

• Replace HPS with LED on existing grid circuits where cabling is sound
• Deploy stand‑alone solar streetlights on problematic stretches (flood‑prone, cable theft, or capacity‑constrained)
• Use a unified CMS to manage both grid‑connected and solar assets

This approach avoids full network reconstruction while capturing a significant portion of the energy and OPEX savings.

5.3 High‑reliability zones: hospitals, evacuation routes, and critical nodes

For critical corridors, lighting continuity during grid outages is essential for safety and emergency logistics.

Solar streetlighting role:

• Operate independently of the grid, ensuring illumination during blackouts
• Provide localized backup power for low‑power sensors or communication devices
• Integrate with emergency management systems to adjust lighting levels during incidents

Systems in these zones typically use higher autonomy (3–5 nights) and redundant communication paths.

5.4 Industrial parks and private campuses

Industrial parks, logistics hubs, and large campuses often manage their own internal roads and lighting.

Benefits of solar streetlighting in these contexts:

• Reduced dependency on internal LV networks and transformers
• Faster reconfiguration as site layouts change
• Clear accounting of lighting energy use for sustainability reporting

Smart control allows facility managers to align lighting profiles with shift patterns, reducing energy use during off‑peak periods without compromising safety.

---

Conclusion

For cities and infrastructure owners, the move from conventional grid‑connected streetlighting to solar streetlighting is increasingly justified on both economic and technical grounds. When evaluated on a lifecycle basis, solar streetlighting can deliver lower CAPEX in many greenfield or constrained environments, significantly reduced OPEX, and enhanced resilience.

The full value, however, is realized when solar streetlighting is paired with smart control strategies—adaptive dimming, centralized monitoring, and predictive analytics—turning a static asset into a responsive, data‑driven component of the broader smart city ecosystem. Procurement decisions should therefore consider not only the luminaire and PV specifications but also communication capabilities, control algorithms, and integration with existing asset management and smart city platforms.

---

About SOLARTODO

SOLARTODO is a global integrated solution provider specializing in solar power generation systems, energy-storage products, smart street-lighting and solar street-lighting, intelligent security & IoT linkage systems, power transmission towers, telecom communication towers, and smart-agriculture solutions for worldwide B2B customers.