8.4MW Utility Scale Thin-Film CdTe 2-axis Tracker - 8,394 kWp Solar PV System deployed in an international application environment
Solar PV

8.4MW Utility Scale Thin-Film CdTe 2-axis Tracker - 8,394 kWp Solar PV System

EPC Price Range
$3,062,986 - $3,913,832

Key Features

  • 8,394 kWp DC utility-scale CdTe configuration with 18.4% nominal module efficiency.
  • 2-axis tracking; representative yield is 27.78% above the explicitly assumed fixed-mount alternative.
  • Illustrative first-year generation of 19,306.2 MWh at a 26.26% DC-based capacity factor.
  • Indicative EPC pricing of $3,062,986–$3,913,832, including a 1-year EPC warranty.
  • Illustrative $3,763,112 EPC budget and 3.80-year simple payback at $0.06/kWh, subject to stated assumptions.

An 8,394 kWp DC utility-scale photovoltaic system combining thin-film CdTe modules, 18.4% nominal module efficiency, and dual-axis tracking. Indicative EPC pricing is $3,062,986–$3,913,832; representative annual generation of 19,306.2 MWh requires site-specific validation.

Description

The 8.4MW Utility Scale Thin-Film CdTe 2-axis Tracker is an 8,394 kWp DC photovoltaic system configured with cadmium telluride modules, 18.4% nominal module efficiency, and dual-axis solar tracking. SOLARTODO lists an indicative EPC investment of $3,062,986–$3,913,832, including installation, commissioning, and a 1-year EPC warranty, subject to an agreed site-specific scope.

Technical Specifications

The 8.4 MW product designation rounds the specified 8.394 MWp DC capacity; it does not describe continuous AC export. An illustrative electrical design uses 7,500 kW AC conversion capacity, giving a DC/AC ratio of 1.119. The 18.4% efficiency input is already a percentage conversion from 0.184 and must not be reported as 0.184%.

ParameterConfiguration or planning assumption
DC nameplate capacity8,394 kWp
Module technologyThin-film CdTe
Nominal module efficiency18.4% at standard test conditions
Illustrative module schedule16,788 modules × 500 W
Illustrative inverter schedule3 central inverters × 2,500 kW AC
Tracker arrangement2 axes: azimuth and elevation
Illustrative tracker schedule1,399 tables × 12 modules
Representative first-year generation19,306.2 MWh
DC-based capacity factor26.26%
Preliminary site allowance120,000–180,000 m²
EPC workmanship/support term1 year

The 500 W module schedule is an arithmetic planning example, not a confirmed manufacturer bill of materials. First Solar Series 7 provides a relevant CdTe technology reference, but its published product page lists different wattages and efficiencies, including TR1 ratings up to 550 W and 19.7%. Selecting Series 7 therefore requires revised module counts, mounting compatibility, regional availability, and manufacturer approval. First Solar Series 7.

System Architecture

The 8,394 kWp array feeds DC collection circuits, central inverters, AC collection equipment, step-up transformers, and the utility interconnection. The illustrative 3 × 2,500 kW inverter arrangement establishes a budgeting basis rather than a final protection design. Engineers must verify maximum string voltage at minimum temperature, operating voltage at maximum temperature, input current, grounding requirements, and transformer loading before freezing the single-line diagram.

Each illustrative tracker carries 12 modules totaling 6 kWp, with 2 controlled axes adjusting elevation and azimuth. Actual actuator torque, foundation dimensions, motion limits, cable loops, and wind-stow positions depend on the selected module geometry and local loading criteria. A dual-axis structure cannot be assumed compatible with a module merely because another tracker uses the same nominal wattage or mounting rail.

Solar PV technical diagram and workshop illustration for the 2-axis system

CdTe Performance and Land Requirements

At standard irradiance of 1,000 W/m², the specified 18.4% efficiency corresponds to approximately 184 W of rated output per square metre of module surface. Dividing 8,394,000 W by 184 W/m² gives approximately 45,620 m² of aggregate module area. This calculation excludes tracker spacing, roads, drainage, inverter stations, fencing, and the substation; module area must never be substituted directly for the project land requirement.

A preliminary 120,000–180,000 m² site allowance equals 12–18 hectares and implies module-area coverage of approximately 25–38%. These figures are screening assumptions, not a surveyed layout or permitting commitment. Dual-axis sweep envelopes, shading, topography, and maintenance access can require more land. The final layout should evaluate collision clearances and shading across all 12 months, including low winter sun angles and storm-stow positions.

For a numerical temperature sensitivity illustration, assume power coefficients of −0.28%/°C for CdTe and −0.35%/°C for a conventional silicon alternative. At 65°C cell temperature, 40°C above the 25°C reference, calculated temperature losses are 11.2% and 14.0%, respectively: a 2.8-percentage-point difference. These coefficients are modeling assumptions, not certified values for the unselected module; approved datasheets must replace them before energy assessment.

Energy Yield and Conventional-System Comparison

For a representative MENA solar farm scenario, assume a first-year net specific yield of 2,300 kWh/kWp, after modeled conversion losses, soiling, shading, tracker consumption, and availability. Multiplying by 8,394 kWp gives 19,306,200 kWh/year, or 19,306.2 MWh/year. This is an illustrative planning scenario, not a customer installation, measured result, P50 assessment, or production guarantee; no site weather file has been supplied.

The associated DC-based capacity factor is 2,300 ÷ 8,760 = 26.26%, using a 365-day year. A bankable assessment requires hourly weather, horizon shading, loss assumptions, curtailment, and export constraints. NREL's PVWatts methodology supports 2-axis configuration, but selecting that option does not validate the assumed 2,300 kWh/kWp yield. Separate shading treatment is particularly important for dual-axis layouts. PVWatts V8 technical documentation.

For a consistent alternative comparison, assume the same 8,394 kWp capacity delivers 1,800 kWh/kWp with conventional fixed mounting. Annual production would be 15,109.2 MWh, making the representative dual-axis scenario 27.78% higher, or 4,197 MWh more annually. This comparison changes the assumed mounting yield while holding nameplate capacity constant; it does not attribute the entire uplift to CdTe chemistry or establish a universal tracking advantage.

At an assumed electricity value of $0.06/kWh, the additional 4,197,000 kWh has gross annual value of $251,820. The supplied mounting references of $0.18/W for dual-axis and $0.08/W for fixed mounting imply an $839,400 equipment premium and approximately 3.33 years of incremental gross recovery. Higher tracker maintenance, foundations, financing, and downtime extend that recovery; a single-axis alternative also deserves a separate site-specific comparison.

Cloud Monitoring

The 8,394 kWp plant should specify supervisory monitoring for inverter power, DC voltage, AC energy, tracker position, weather, and alarms. An illustrative monitoring scope uses 1-minute collection intervals and 15-minute reporting aggregates; these are procurement requirements rather than verified platform features. Include irradiance and module-temperature sensors so operators can distinguish weather-driven output changes from inverter outages, tracker misalignment, and abnormal soiling.

For the 3-inverter example, dashboards should identify each inverter and associated tracker groups, with daily energy totals and time-stamped event histories. Define data ownership, access permissions, export formats, retention periods, and communications availability in the contract. A 99% data-availability target can support operations planning, but it is separate from plant energy availability and requires an explicit measurement boundary and service agreement.

Solar installation and cloud-platform illustration for monitoring the 8.4 MW system

Standards, Procurement, and Commissioning

CdTe module procurement should request qualification evidence against the IEC 61215 series, including the technology-specific requirements of IEC 61215-1-2:2021 and its applicable amendments. Record the exact model, manufacturing location, certificate scope, and test-report identifiers. These references define procurement requirements; this page does not establish that the proposed 8,394 kWp assembly or an unspecified module already holds certification. IEC CdTe qualification requirements.

Module electrical and mechanical safety should be evaluated against the applicable IEC 61730 series, including the construction requirements in IEC 61730-1:2023. For North American projects, confirm the utility, authority, and applicable UL listing requirements for the exact model; a generic UL 1703 reference is insufficient evidence of present market acceptance. CE documentation, where required, must likewise be verified for the supplied equipment. IEC 61730-1:2023.

Inverter anti-islanding assessment should reference IEC 62116:2014, which specifies a test procedure rather than complete grid-code approval. The 7,500 kW AC example also requires utility review of reactive-power control, voltage and frequency response, protection coordination, and export limits. Commissioning records should document functional tests, meter checks, tracker stow, communications, and agreed performance baselines before handover. IEC 62116:2014.

EPC Investment Analysis and Pricing Structure

The quoted EPC range of $3,062,986–$3,913,832 corresponds to approximately $0.365–$0.466/Wp DC. Engineering covers the agreed electrical, structural, and civil design; procurement covers approved equipment; construction covers agreed installation works; commissioning covers documented testing and handover. The package includes 1 year of EPC warranty support. Land acquisition, taxes, extraordinary groundworks, and utility network reinforcement require explicit inclusion or separate allowances.

Procurement tierIndicative USD rangePrincipal scope
FOB Supply$1,899,051–$2,661,406Equipment supply; named loading port to be agreed
CIF Delivered$2,095,223–$2,936,329Supply plus ocean freight and insurance to the named destination port
EPC Turnkey$3,062,986–$3,913,832Agreed engineering, equipment, construction, commissioning, and 1-year EPC warranty

The 3 tiers are commercial budget ranges, not interchangeable delivery obligations. The supplied equipment tier was described as both FOB and ex-works China; those terms require different responsibilities and must be resolved in the quotation. CIF does not automatically include import duties, inland transport, or installation. A First Solar selection also requires confirmation of actual manufacturing origin, authorized sourcing, shipping route, and country-specific import requirements.

Consolidated order thresholdIndicative discount
50+ equivalent system packages5%
100+ equivalent system packages10%
250+ equivalent system packages15%

The 50+, 100+, and 250+ thresholds refer to equivalent complete system packages, not individual panels; at 8.394 MWp each, they represent very large portfolios. Discounts require written confirmation of standardized scope, delivery schedule, and the eligible price base. Apply the single qualifying discount rather than adding percentages, and do not assume that freight, taxes, utility charges, or subcontracted work receive the same reduction.

The illustrative itemized EPC budget totals $3,763,112: $2,644,592 for equipment, $220,000 for freight and insurance, and $898,520 for installation, engineering, commissioning, grid-connection allowance, and 1-year support. Equipment prices are estimating allocations, not verified supplier quotations. The tracker allowance of $720 per 6 kWp table equals $0.12/Wp, below the supplied $0.18/W reference; procurement must confirm this assumption before financial commitment.

For the representative 19,306,200 kWh annual output, a flat $0.06/kWh realized energy value produces $1,158,372/year in gross benefit. With an assumed $20/kWp-year operating budget, annual operating cost is $167,880 and first-year net operating benefit is $990,492. This is avoided electricity expenditure only where consumption and settlement permit it; for an export project, use the applicable PPA revenue and curtailment provisions instead.

Dividing the EPC range by $990,492 gives a simple payback of approximately 3.09–3.95 years, with 3.80 years for the itemized budget. At energy values of $0.04/kWh and $0.08/kWh, the same itemized budget gives approximately 6.23 and 2.73 years, respectively. These calculations exclude debt service, tax, working capital, degradation, and residual value; they do not establish a guaranteed investment return.

Using the $3,763,112 budget, a 25-year analysis, 6% real discount rate, 0.5% annual energy degradation, $167,880 annual operating cost, and $150,000 inverter reserve in year 13 gives an illustrative discounted LCOE of approximately $0.0253/kWh. IRENA reports $0.043/kWh as the global weighted average for utility-scale solar commissioned in 2024; that historical benchmark does not validate this project's unusually low supplied capital budget. IRENA renewable generation costs.

Payment options are 30% T/T deposit plus 70% against B/L, or 100% L/C at sight, subject to the signed contract. For EPC, construction milestones and acceptance security should be documented separately from shipment payment. Financing enquiries can be evaluated for projects above $5,000,000, subject to lender approval; the single-system range here is below that threshold. Contact [email protected] for scope and commercial clarification.

Applications, Maintenance, and Project Configuration

The 8.394 MWp configuration suits utility export, industrial power supply, and appropriately permitted energy infrastructure where land, grid access, and tracking economics align. Hot climates warrant close review of module temperature behavior; humid or diffuse-light sites still need local weather and corrosion assessment. For category alternatives, View all Solar PV System products, comparing identical DC capacities and clearly defined AC export limits.

For maintenance planning, the illustrative 1,399-table arrangement requires inspections of 2-axis drives, bearings, cable movement, fasteners, and stow operation. Establish cleaning frequency using measured soiling and available water rather than a universal calendar. The commercial template targets 25-year panel performance coverage and 10-year inverter coverage, subject to selected manufacturer terms; these are distinct from the included 1-year EPC warranty and require written confirmation.

Applying an illustrative displaced-grid factor of 0.45 tCO₂/MWh to 19,306.2 MWh gives 8,687.8 tCO₂/year of estimated operational displacement. This excludes embodied emissions and is not a certified carbon credit. To refine the 8,394 kWp design, Configure your system online, Learn about solar yield and lifecycle economics, and Request a custom quotation with site coordinates, grid requirements, and delivery scope.

Technical Specifications

System Capacity8394kWp DC
Module TypeThin-film cadmium telluride (CdTe); manufacturer and model to be selected
Module Efficiency18.4%
Array Configuration2-axis tracking: azimuth and elevation
ApplicationUtility-scale ground-mounted solar PV
Illustrative Module Quantity16788 modules rated at 500 W each; final schedule subject to selection
Illustrative Inverter Capacity7500kW AC
Illustrative DC/AC Ratio1.119
Est. Annual Generation19306.2; representative first-year scenario, not a site-specific forecastMWh/year
Capacity Factor26.26; DC-nameplate basis, representative scenario%
Aggregate Module Surface AreaApproximately 45620; calculated from rated capacity and 18.4% efficiencym²
System Area120000–180000; preliminary land allowance, subject to layout and surveym²
CO₂ Offset8687.8; illustrative operational displacement at 0.45 tCO₂/MWh, excluding lifecycle emissionsmetric tons/year
Payback Period3.09–3.95; simple payback at $0.06/kWh and stated operating assumptionsyears
LCOE0.0253; illustrative discounted result using the $3,763,112 budget and stated assumptionsUSD/kWh
Panel Warranty25-year performance coverage target; selected manufacturer terms require confirmation
Inverter Warranty10-year coverage target; selected manufacturer terms require confirmation
EPC Warranty1 year; scope and remedies defined by contract
Illustrative EPC Budget3763112USD

Price Breakdown

ItemQuantityUnit PriceSubtotal
CdTe module, illustrative 500 W specification16788 pcs$49$822,612
Dual-axis tracker assembly, illustrative 6 kWp table1399 pcs$720$1,007,280
Central inverter, 2500 kW AC3 pcs$125,000$375,000
DC cables and combiner equipment package1 pcs$167,880$167,880
AC collection, transformers and switchgear package1 pcs$251,820$251,820
SCADA, weather sensors and monitoring package1 pcs$20,000$20,000
Ocean freight and insurance allowance1 pcs$220,000$220,000
Civil works and installation labor1 pcs$671,520$671,520
Engineering and quality control1 pcs$100,000$100,000
Testing and commissioning1 pcs$75,000$75,000
1-Year EPC Warranty and Support1 pcs$50,000$50,000
Routine grid-connection allowance, excluding network reinforcement1 pcs$2,000$2,000
Total Price Range$3,062,986 - $3,913,832

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the 8.4 MW rating represent?
The product designation rounds an 8,394 kWp DC module array to 8.4 MW. It does not specify continuous AC export. The illustrative design uses 3 central inverters rated at 2,500 kW each, totaling 7,500 kW AC. Final export capacity depends on inverter selection, thermal derating, transformer ratings, and the utility interconnection agreement.
Are First Solar Series 7 modules included as standard?
No specific manufacturer model is confirmed for this configuration. The supplied design efficiency is 18.4%, while First Solar Series 7 has model-specific ratings and mounting requirements. The illustrative schedule uses 16,788 generic 500 W CdTe modules. Specifying Series 7 requires a revised bill of materials, approved tracker interfaces, regional supply confirmation, and manufacturer warranty documentation.
How much electricity can the dual-axis system generate?
The representative scenario assumes 2,300 kWh/kWp annually, giving 19,306.2 MWh in year 1 and a 26.26% DC-based capacity factor. Against an assumed fixed-mount yield of 1,800 kWh/kWp, this is 27.78% higher. These are planning assumptions, not measured results; local weather, shading, tracker availability, soiling, and curtailment determine actual production.
What do the EPC price and warranty cover?
The indicative EPC range is $3,062,986–$3,913,832 for agreed engineering, procurement, construction, commissioning, and 1-year EPC warranty support. The illustrative itemized budget is $3,763,112. Panel performance coverage of 25 years and inverter coverage of 10 years are procurement targets requiring manufacturer confirmation. Land, taxes, network reinforcement, exclusions, and warranty remedies must be defined in the quotation.
What information is needed for a binding quotation?
Provide site coordinates, available land, geotechnical information, wind criteria, grid voltage, export limits, delivery port, and the requested equipment brands for the 8,394 kWp system. Confirm whether supply, CIF delivery, or EPC is required. Payment options are 30% T/T plus 70% against B/L, or 100% L/C at sight, subject to the contract.

Certifications & Standards

IEC 61215 series, including IEC 61215-1-2 for CdTe: procurement requirement; model-specific certification pending verification
IEC 61215 series, including IEC 61215-1-2 for CdTe: procurement requirement; model-specific certification pending verification
IEC 61730 series: module safety requirement; model-specific certification pending verification
IEC 61730 series: module safety requirement; model-specific certification pending verification
IEC 62116:2014: inverter anti-islanding test reference; selected inverter evidence required
IEC 62116:2014: inverter anti-islanding test reference; selected inverter evidence required
Applicable UL module listing, including evaluation of any UL 1703 documentation: jurisdiction-dependent; not verified
CE conformity documentation: required where applicable; not verified

Data Sources & References

  • •SOLARTODO supplied configuration and commercial ranges: 8,394 kWp, 18.4% efficiency, dual-axis tracking; indicative prices, not verified supplier quotations.
  • •First Solar, Series 7 product specifications and regional application information: https://www.firstsolar.com/en/Products/Series-7
  • •NREL-developed PVWatts V8 methodology and array-type documentation: https://developer.nlr.gov/docs/solar/pvwatts/v8/
  • •IEC 61215-1-2:2021, CdTe-specific module qualification requirements: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/61347
  • •IEC 61730-1:2023, photovoltaic module safety construction requirements: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/59803
  • •IEC 62116:2014, inverter islanding-prevention test procedure: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/6479
  • •IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024, published 2025: https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2024
  • •Illustrative engineering and financial calculations: 2,300 kWh/kWp-year, $0.06/kWh energy value, $20/kWp-year operating cost, 25-year evaluation, 6% real discount rate, and 0.5% annual degradation; no site-specific simulation performed.

Interested in this solution?

Contact us for a customized quote based on your specific requirements.

Contact Us